The test is designed to stop someone who has a right to enter the UK from claiming social benefits immediately after their arrival. Most applicants for local authority housing or welfare benefits must pass the habitual residence test, although there are important exceptions. The rules on this page apply equally to housing applications and to claims for universal credit (UC), housing benefit (HB), council tax rebate (CTR) and other passport benefits (e.g. income support, state pension credit, etc.).
The test also applies to claims for UC/HB/CTR (and, except in Scotland, for housing) by British and Irish citizens who lived abroad and are returning to live in the UK, as well as to people who have never lived in the UK previously.
The test requires the claimant/applicant to be habitually resident in the ‘Common Travel Area’.
UC law says a person is not entitled to benefit unless s/he is ‘in Great Britain’ and that:
The DWP treat the requirement to be in Great Britain as a two-stage test. The DWP decision maker (DM) first decides if the person has a right to reside. If s/he does the DM will then decide if that person is habitually resident based on the particular facts in that case.
If benefit is refused the DWP must notify the claimant (often a message in the claimant’s UC journal). The notice usually says the claimant is not entitled because they are ‘not in Great Britain’ and does not say why (i.e., no right to reside or not habitually resident). If that person has EU pre-settled status you should ask for a full statement of reasons. Decisions about the right to reside for EEA nationals are complex and DMs often make mistakes.
The same applies to decisions about HB – but in this case the law says the claimant must be habitually resident instead of being in Great Britain. If benefit is refused for either reason the decision notice will tell them it is because they are not habitually resident.
The claimant usually has one month to ask the DWP to reconsider and if the new decision does not give them everything they asked for, a further month to appeal to a tribunal. In either case if the claimant asks for a statement of reasons before the time limit has expired, the time limit is extended by 14 days (or 14 days from the date the DWP notifies the new decision, if later). For more information see: how to appeal.
The following people do not have to show they are habitually resident (in other words they are exempt from the test):
(Note that the links in the above bullet list are to the England and Wales pages of the website)
In the case of claims for housing benefit or council tax rebate only, a person who is in receipt of any one of the following benefits:
All of the following people have to show that they are habitually resident to qualify for housing or benefits:
The term ‘habitual residence’ is not defined. It is decided by looking at all the facts of the case, but no single list can be drawn up to govern all cases. However, the DWP gives good general advice based on European law in Advice for Decision Makers (ADM) Chapter C1 (pdf) paragraphs C1946-75, as does the HB Guidance Manual, part C4 (pdf) (paragraphs C4.80-88 and C4.92-112), the English Homelessness Code of Guidance paragraphs 7.21-23 and Annex 1, and the Welsh Allocation of accommodation and homelessness guidance for local authorities (pdf) (paras. 2.18-2.24).
To be habitually resident in the UK a person must have taken up residence and lived here for a period. A person who leaves another country does not become habitually resident immediately on arrival, even if s/he came here voluntarily with the intention to settle. S/he must be resident in fact for an appropriate period of time which demonstrates that his/her residence has become, and is likely to remain, habitual in nature (see: Nessa v Chief Adjudication Officer [1999] UKHL 41 and ADM paragraph C1951). But different rules apply if a person is returning to the UK to re-establish his/her residence here (see below).
There are two main requirements to establish habitual residence (R(IS) 6/96):
There is no fixed period that qualifies as an ‘appreciable period of time’. It will vary according to the facts of the case taking account of the length, continuity and nature of the residence: (R(IS) 6/96). For example, is there any previous residence and what was it for (e.g. a holiday)? However, benefits case law suggests that the period lies between one and three months: CIS/4474/2003, paras 18-19. The DWP and DLUHC homelessness guidance sources above suggest that the main factors to be taken into account are:
The guidance stresses that no one factor is more important than another and that the weighting given to each will depend on the particular facts of each case (see ADM paragraphs C1965-75, Code of Guidance, Annex 1 paragraphs 5-21).
A good example is Olokunboro v Croydon LBC (Croydon County Court 31/10/2002 - see Legal Action February 2003, page 37). The applicant had spent most of her life outside the UK, which was the country of her birth and citizenship. As a child, she did not decide where she lived, and so could not establish habitual residence then. She returned to the UK after a relationship breakdown and applied for accommodation. The court reversed the local authority’s decision that she was not habitually resident because the authority had placed undue emphasis on the fact that she had arrived with no accommodation and little money (that her residence was “not viable”) compared with the weight given to other factors like her citizenship and her ties to the UK. All factors should be given consideration and appropriate weight, which will vary from case to case according to the particular facts. The failure to give appropriate weight to her very b ties to the UK created a risk that some people would be excluded on the grounds of income alone.
Habitual residence can be lost in a single day, for example if someone leaves the UK with the intention to settle long-term in another country.
Once habitual residence has been established it resumes immediately on return from a short single absence (e.g. a holiday).
In deciding whether habitual residence is regained after a longer absence or after a series of absences, a decision will depend on the circumstances in which the person left and returned to the UK, their intentions concerning the absence (was it intended to be temporary), and any continuing links with the UK.